Generative Artificial Intelligence and Cybercrime: Emerging Threats and Regulatory Responses

Authors

  • Zainuddin Ahmad Surya Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Author

Keywords:

Generative AI, Cybercrime, Digital Fraud, Artificial Intelligence Regulation, Criminal Law, Online Security

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has introduced transformative capabilities in content creation, but it also presents new opportunities for cybercriminal activities. The ability of GenAI systems to produce realistic text, images, audio, and code has facilitated the emergence of sophisticated cyber fraud, phishing schemes, identity theft, and automated hacking tools. This article investigates the evolving relationship between generative AI and cybercrime, focusing on emerging threats and regulatory responses at both national and international levels. Using doctrinal legal analysis and comparative evaluation, the study examines existing cybercrime regulations and their adequacy in addressing AI-enabled offences. The findings reveal that current legal frameworks are largely reactive and insufficient to address the speed and scale of GenAI-driven criminal innovation. Key challenges include attribution of responsibility, detection of AI-generated content, and jurisdictional complexities in cross-border digital crimes. The article proposes a multi-layered regulatory approach combining criminal law reform, platform accountability, and AI governance frameworks. It concludes that effective regulation must anticipate technological evolution rather than respond retrospectively, ensuring that criminal justice systems remain resilient in the face of rapidly advancing generative technologies.

References

Bishop, Matt. 2003. Computer Security: Art and Science. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

Brenner, Susan W. 2010. Cybercrime: Criminal Threats from Cyberspace. Santa Barbara: Praeger.

Brown, Tom B., Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, et al. 2020. “Language Models are Few-Shot Learners.” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. (Book/Proceedings volume)

Brundage, Miles, Shahar Avin, Jack Clark, et al. 2018. The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation. Oxford: Future of Humanity Institute.

Cath, Corinne. 2018. “Governing Artificial Intelligence: Ethical, Legal, and Technical Opportunities and Challenges.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 376 (2133).

Chen, Mark, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, et al. 2021. Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code. OpenAI Technical Report.

Chesney, Robert, and Danielle Keats Citron. 2019. “Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge for Privacy, Democracy, and National Security.” California Law Review 107 (6): 1753–1820.

Citron, Danielle Keats. 2022. The Fight for Privacy: Protecting Dignity, Identity, and Trust in the Digital Age. New York: Norton.

Clarke, Richard A., and Robert Knake. 2010. Cyber War. New York: HarperCollins.

Clough, Jonathan. 2015. Principles of Cybercrime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Council of Europe. 2001. Convention on Cybercrime (Budapest Convention).

European Union. 2022. Artificial Intelligence Act (Draft Regulation).

European Union. 2022. Digital Services Act (Regulation (EU) 2022/2065).

Europol. 2022. Internet Organised Crime Threat Assessment (IOCTA) 2022. The Hague: Europol.

Farid, Hany. 2022. Fake Photos and Real Liars: The Rise of Deepfakes. MIT Press.

Floridi, Luciano, and Massimo Chiriatti. 2020. “GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences.” Minds and Machines 30 (4): 681–694.

Floridi, Luciano. 2014. The Ethics of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goodfellow, Ian, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville. 2016. Deep Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Ho, Jonathan, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. 2020. “Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models.” In NeurIPS Proceedings.

Jia, Ye, et al. 2018. Transfer Learning from Speaker Verification to Multispeaker Text-To-Speech Synthesis. Google Research Technical Report.

Kshetri, Nir. 2013. Cybercrime and Cybersecurity in the Global South. Springer.

Lessig, Lawrence. 2006. Code: Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books.

Nissenbaum, Helen. 2010. Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford University Press.

OECD. 2019. OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Ohm, Paul. 2010. “Broken Promises of Privacy.” UCLA Law Review 57: 1701–1777.

Russell, Stuart, and Peter Norvig. 2021. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson.

Schjølberg, Stein. 2017. Cybercrime Law and AI Governance. Oslo: Norwegian Center for Cybersecurity Law.

State Council of China. 2023. Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services.

U.S. Congress. 1986. Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA).

UNESCO. 2021. Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Paris: UNESCO.

Veale, Michael, and Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius. 2021. “Demystifying the Draft EU AI Act.” Computer Law Review International 22 (4): 97–112.

Wachter, Sandra, Brent Mittelstadt, and Luciano Floridi. 2017. “Why a Right to Explanation of Automated Decision-Making Does Not Exist in the GDPR.” International Data Privacy Law 7 (2): 76–99.

Wall, David S. 2007. Cybercrime: The Transformation of Crime in the Information Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

White House. 2023. Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence.

Yar, Majid. 2013. Cybercrime and Society. London: Sage.

Zhang, Chen, and Dawei Li. 2022. Internet Governance and Cybersecurity in China. Beijing: Springer.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-15

How to Cite

“Generative Artificial Intelligence and Cybercrime: Emerging Threats and Regulatory Responses”. 2025. Indonesian Journal of Digital Crime and Criminal Justice 1 (1): 125-62. https://journal.criminallawinstitute.org/JDCCJ/article/view/19.