Technology-Driven Criminal Justice Reform: Enhancing Access to Justice in the Digital Era

Authors

  • Brian Aksa Pratama Universitas Pancasila Author

Keywords:

Access to Justice, Criminal Justice Reform, Digital Transformation, Indonesia, Legal Technology, Judicial Efficiency

Abstract

Technology-driven reforms in criminal justice systems are increasingly recognized as a means to improve access to justice, particularly in developing countries such as Indonesia. Digital platforms, electronic case management systems, and online dispute resolution mechanisms have been introduced to enhance efficiency and reduce procedural barriers. This article analyzes the role of technology in facilitating criminal justice reform in Indonesia, with a focus on improving access to justice in the digital era. Using normative legal research and comparative approaches, the study evaluates the effectiveness of current technological implementations in judicial and law enforcement institutions. The findings reveal that digital tools have contributed to faster case processing and improved administrative transparency. However, challenges persist in the form of unequal digital access, limited technological literacy, and concerns regarding data security and procedural fairness. The article argues that technology alone is insufficient to achieve meaningful justice reform without accompanying legal and institutional safeguards. It proposes a holistic framework that integrates digital infrastructure development, capacity-building, and regulatory oversight. The study concludes that technology-driven criminal justice reform must prioritize inclusivity and legal accountability to ensure equitable access to justice for all citizens.

References

African Union. 2019. Digital Transformation Strategy for Africa (2020–2030). Addis Ababa.

APJII (Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia). 2023. Laporan Survei Internet Indonesia 2023. Jakarta: APJII.

Cappelletti, Mauro, and Bryant Garth. 1978. Access to Justice: The Worldwide Movement to Make Rights Effective. Milan: Giuffrè.

CNJ Brazil (National Council of Justice). 2022. Relatório Justiça em Números: Processo Judicial Eletrônico (PJe). Brasília.

Dunleavy, Patrick, Helen Margetts, Simon Bastow, and Jane Tinkler. 2006. “New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (3): 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057

e-Committee Supreme Court of India. 2021. e-Courts Project Phase II Report. New Delhi.

Ferguson, Andrew G. 2017. The Rise of Big Data Policing. New York: NYU Press.

Hildebrandt, Mireille. 2015. Smart Technologies and the End(s) of Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Jewkes, Yvonne, and Bianca C. Reisdorf. 2016. “A Tale of Two Prisons: ICTs, Surveillance and the Digital Divide in Correctional Facilities.” The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice 55 (1–2): 128–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12164

Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi (PANRB). 2021. Digital Government Transformation Strategy Indonesia. Jakarta.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. 2019. Pedoman Administrasi Perkara Secara Elektronik (e-Court dan e-Litigation). Jakarta: MA RI.

OECD. 2020. Digital Government Review of Indonesia: Towards a Public Sector Digital Transformation. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Osborne, Stephen P. 2010. The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on Public Governance. London: Routledge.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. 2021. Ilmu Hukum: Pencarian, Pembebasan dan Pencerahan. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Sandefur, Rebecca. 2019. “Access to What?” Daedalus 148 (1): 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01747

Suhariyanto, Bambang. 2022. “Transformasi Digital Peradilan dan Akses Keadilan di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 11 (2): 201–220.

Susskind, Richard. 2023. Tomorrow’s Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tyler, Tom R. 2006. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

UNDP. 2020. Access to Justice and Rule of Law in the Digital Age. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

van Dijk, Jan. 2020. The Digital Divide. Cambridge: Polity Press.

World Bank. 2018. World Development Report 2018: Learning to Realize Education’s Promise. Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Bank. 2020. GovTech Maturity Index: The State of Public Sector Digital Transformation. Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Justice Project. 2023. Rule of Law Index 2023. Washington, DC: WJP.

Yeung, Karen. 2018. “Algorithmic Regulation: A Critical Interrogation.” Regulation & Governance 12 (4): 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12158

Downloads

Published

2026-01-15

How to Cite

“Technology-Driven Criminal Justice Reform: Enhancing Access to Justice in the Digital Era”. 2026. Indonesian Journal of Digital Crime and Criminal Justice 2 (1): 79-106. https://journal.criminallawinstitute.org/JDCCJ/article/view/23.